<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">brhejo</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">The BRICS Health Journal</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>The BRICS Health Journal</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">3034-4700</issn><issn pub-type="epub">3034-4719</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Sechenov University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.47093/3034-4700.2025.2.1.38-52</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">brhejo-22</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Public, Environmental and Occupational Health</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Healthy lifestyles of contemporary Chinese population: challenges and new initiatives in primary cancer prevention</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title></trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9465-6381</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Mengyao Wu, PhD candidate, Department of Cancer Prevention and Control</p><p>Beijing, 100021, China </p><p> </p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0147-9650</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Huang Huang, PhD, Department of Cancer Prevention and Control</p><p>Beijing, 100021, China</p><p> </p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2134-3163</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Peiyuan Sun, PhD candidate, Department of Cancer Prevention and Control</p><p>Beijing, 100021, China</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2801-9403</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Qie</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Ranran Qie, PhD, Department of Cancer Epidemiology</p><p>Zhengzhou, Henan, China</p><p> </p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5683-1549</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Zh.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Zhuolun Hu, MSPH, Department of Cancer Prevention and Control</p><p>Beijing, 100021, China</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8760-8889</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Qi Yan, PhD candidate, Department of Cancer Prevention and Control</p><p>Beijing, 100021, China</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8847-3512</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Ruiying Fu, PhD candidate, Department of Cancer Prevention and Control</p><p>Beijing, 100021, China</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1442-9615</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>Yu.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Yubing Lin, Master candidate, Department of Cancer Prevention and Control</p><p>Beijing, 100021, China</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0768-3903</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Xiuqi Ma, PhD, Department of Cancer Prevention and Control</p><p>Beijing, 100021, China</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9762-7752</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Ya.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Yawei Zhang, PhD, Chair, Department of Cancer Prevention and Control</p><p>Beijing, 100021, China</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0285-5403</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>He</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Jie He, MD, President</p><p>Beijing, 100021, China</p><p> </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">hejie@cicams.ac.cn</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="en" id="aff-1"><institution>National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital; &#13;
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences; &#13;
Peking Union Medical College</institution><country>China</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en" id="aff-2"><institution>Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University &amp; Henan Cancer Hospital; &#13;
Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control; &#13;
Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention</institution><country>China</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>05</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>38</fpage><lpage>52</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Wu M., Huang H., Sun P., Qie R., Hu Z., Yan Q., Fu R., Lin Y., Ma X., Zhang Y., He J., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Wu M., Huang H., Sun P., Qie R., Hu Z., Yan Q., Fu R., Lin Y., Ma X., Zhang Y., He J.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Wu M., Huang H., Sun P., Qie R., Hu Z., Yan Q., Fu R., Lin Y., Ma X., Zhang Y., He J.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.bricshealthjournal.com/jour/article/view/22">https://www.bricshealthjournal.com/jour/article/view/22</self-uri><abstract><p>Greater than 40% of cancer can be prevented through modifiable risk factors. The World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for Cancer Research recommended healthy lifestyles for cancer prevention. No study, however, has investigated adoption rate of cancer prevention lifestyles in China. This article utilized data from a baseline survey of major cancer related risk factors in China including 89,045 participants. The results showed that the adoption rate of healthy lifestyles for cancer prevention among the contemporary Chinese population was 24.49%. Women (28.91%), individuals aged 40 years or older (26.43%-38.41%), had lower education level (27.60%), lived in rural areas (29.24%) and high or middle human development index regions (24.98%), and were unemployed (29.14%) had higher adoption rates. The adoption rate of healthy lifestyles was lowest among participants aged 25–29 years (14.16%) and showed an increased trend with age (P for trend &lt; 0.001), with similar trends observed across subgroups stratified by sex, education level, residential area, and employment status (all P for trend &lt; 0.001). Despite challenges in implementing primary cancer prevention, recent initiatives such as China Code Against Cancer and the Smart Health Management Digital Platform for Primary Cancer Prevention are expected to promote healthy lifestyles among the Chinese population, supported by national policies and international guidelines.</p><p> </p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>preventive oncology</kwd><kwd>modifiable risk factors</kwd><kwd>lifestyle adoption</kwd><kwd>Smart Health Management</kwd><kwd>Code Against Cancer</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="en">This study was supported by the Nonprofit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (grant number 2021-RC310-009), the Capital’s Funds for Health Improvement and Research (grant number 2022-1G-4023), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 82204168).</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>Introduction</title><p>Non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including cancer, become a significant public health challenge, hindering progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals. NCDs accounted for 75% of non-pandemic-related deaths worldwide in 2021, with the majority occurring in low- and middle-income countries1. Cancer is responsible for about 10 million deaths annually, second only to cardiovascular disease as the leading cause of NCD death globally2 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit1">1</xref>]. In China, there are 4.8 million new cases and 2.6 million deaths each year, accounting for approximately one-fourth of global cancer incidence and mortality respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit2">2</xref>]. The cancer burden in China is expected to grow by about 50% in the next two decades, driven by the rapidly growing aging population, industrialization, and widespread unhealthy lifestyles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit3">3</xref>]. Growing evidence indicates that more than 40% of cancers are preventable by addressing modifiable risk factors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit4">4</xref>]. Recommendations from the World Health Organization suggest that reducing unhealthy behaviors is one of the most cost-effective ways to tackle NCDs including cancer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit5">5</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit6">6</xref>]. Aligning with the "Healthy China 2030" strategy, promoting healthy lifestyles and early intervention is crucial for reducing the cancer burden in China and worldwide.</p><p>Lifestyle risk factors, including unhealthy diet, alcohol consumption, physical inactivity, obesity, and tobacco use, contributed to more than 40% of global cancer deaths and disability-adjusted life-years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit7">7</xref>], and China shared the same situation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit8">8</xref>]. These individual lifestyle factors often co-exist and have synergistic effect on health [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit9">9</xref>]. World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) and American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) made recommendations on healthy lifestyles for cancer prevention, including being a healthy weight, being physically active, eating a diet rich in wholegrains, vegetables, fruits, and beans, limiting consumption of fast food and other processed foods, limiting consumption of red and processed meat, limiting consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks, and limiting alcohol consumption [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit10">10</xref>]. Multiple studies have provided supporting evidence that individuals who adhere to the 2018 WCRF/AICR recommendations experienced a reduced risk of breast, colorectal, and lung cancer, highlighting that promoting healthy lifestyles can serve as a primary cancer prevention strategy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit11">11</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit12">12</xref>].</p><p>Several studies from North America, Europe, and Africa reported on the prevalence of adherence to the 2018 WCRF/AICR recommendations and found wide variation between study populations, ranging from 6.28% to 40.1%, suggesting that there is considerable scope for promoting healthy lifestyles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit11">11</xref>][13–27]. No study has investigated compliance with the 2018 WCRF/AICR recommendations among Chinese populations.</p><p>This study analyzed data from an ongoing population-based study of major cancer related risk factors in China to understand the status of healthy lifestyles of the contemporary Chinese population follows the 2018 WCRF/AICR recommendations, identify challenges in promoting healthy lifestyles, and share new initiatives in promoting healthy lifestyles.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and methods</title><p>All data was from a baseline survey of major cancer-related risk factors in China between 07.07.2021 and 31.12.2024, including 148,338 participants. All participants were enrolled through the Smart Health Management Digital Platform for Primary Cancer Prevention (SmartHMDP-PCP) with an electronic module-based standardized questionnaire including information on demographic characteristics, lifestyle and environmental factors, medical history and medication use, and family history [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit28">28</xref>]. Majority of the study participants were from Beijing, Guangdong, Shaanxi, Henan, Gansu, Shanxi, and Sichuan provinces in China. Participants with missing data on variables in the 2018 WCRF/AICR recommendations (N=59,293) were excluded, yielding 89,045 participants being included for the final analysis. Electronic informed consents were obtained from all participants before investigation. This study was approved by the ethical committee of the National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.</p><p>The 2018 WCRF/AICR score was calculated by assigning the points of 1, 0.5, and 0 to fully, partially, and not meeting each of the recommended items, respectively. The 2018 WCRF/AICR score is represented in Supplement A (supplementary materials on the journal website https://doi.org/10.47093/3034-4700.2025.2.1.38-52-annex-a). Physical activity was calculated as minutes per week through frequency and duration of moderate-vigorous leisure-time physical activity (e.g., yoga, walking, running, cycling, swimming), transport physical activity (e.g., walking briskly, running), household physical activity (e.g., child care, family care, yard work, scrubbing floors), and occupational physical activity. Total duration of moderate-vigorous physical activity was categorized into ≥150, 75-&lt;150 and &lt;75 mins/week. Dietary information was collected via a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. The intake of fruits and vegetables was divided into three classes: ≥400, 200-&lt;400, and &lt;200 g/day. Total fiber intake was estimated from the frequency of consumption and portion size of food items using the Chinese standard tables of food consumption and subsequently categorized into ≥30, 15-&lt;30, and &lt;15 g/day [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit29">29</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit30">30</xref>]. Alcohol consumption was based on daily ethanol intake of beer, grape wine, rice wine, and liquor. Sex-specific classification of daily ethanol intake was used in scoring alcohol consumption: fully (0 g/day), partially (&gt;0-28 g/day for males and &gt;0-14 g/day for females), and not meeting the recommendation (&gt;28 g/day for males and &gt;14 g/day for females). Red meat intake was categorized as &lt;300, 300-500, and &gt;500 g/week. Total sugar-sweetened drinks intake was categorized into &lt;1, 1-2, and ≥3 can/day. The cutoffs of body mass index (BMI; underweight: &lt;18.5, healthy weight: 18.5-&lt;24, overweight: 24-&lt;28, and obesity: ≥28.0 kg/m²) were based on the criteria proposed by the Working Group on Obesity in China [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit31">31</xref>]. We used takeaways to replace fast food and was categorized into &lt;1, 1-3, and ≥4 time/week. The final score was the sum of all points of seven items, with higher values indicating healthier lifestyle. The score was further categorized into unhealthy (0-4 points), moderately healthy (&gt;4-&lt;6 points), and healthy (6-7 points).</p><p>Characteristics of the study population were presented as numbers (percentages) for qualitative variables, and median (interquartile range) for quantitative variables, by the 2018 WCRF/AICR Score groups. Chi-square tests or Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare differences among the 2018 WCRF/AICR Score groups. The weights of the Segi’s population and China's 2020 Census for calculating age-standardized prevalence rates (ASPR) of three lifestyle groups, respectively3,4. The linear trends of prevalence over age groups were tested using Cochran-Armitage test, both overall and by certain selected subgroups of individuals (e.g., sex, education, urban-rural location, employment status, geographic region, and regional human development index (HDI)). According to Human Development Report Office, regional HDI was divided into low (&lt;0.550), medium (0.550-0.699), high (0.700-0.799), and very high (≥0.800)5. All statistical analyses were done with SAS version 9.4 and R version 4.3.2. Two-sided P value &lt;0.05 was considered as statistical significance.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Among 89,045 participants, the median (interquartile range) age was 38 (29-48) years and 57,384 (64.44%) were women. Of the overall population, 21,803 (24.49%) adopted healthy lifestyles, 54,279 (60.96%) adopted moderately healthy lifestyles, and 12,963 (14.56%) adopted unhealthy lifestyles. The ASPR using the world standard population of healthy, moderately healthy, and unhealthy lifestyle were 26.08%, 60.42%, and 13.50%, respectively. The ASPR (world) of a healthy lifestyle was higher among women, individuals with education below a bachelor’s degree, those who were unemployed, and those residing in rural locations, northern regions, and regions with middle-to-high HDI (all P&lt;0.001; Table).</p><table-wrap id="table-1"><caption><p>Table. Characteristics of participants by the 2018 WCRF/AICR Lifestyle.</p><p>Note: WCRF/AICR – World Cancer Research Fund/ American Institute for Cancer Research, ASRP – age-standartized prevalence rate, HDI – human development index.</p></caption><table><tbody><tr><td>Characteristic</td><td>The 2018 WCRF/AICR Lifestyle</td><td>P-value</td></tr><tr><td>Overall</td><td>Healthy (6-7 points)</td><td>Unhealthy (0-4 points)</td></tr><tr><td>N</td><td>Percent</td><td>N</td><td>Crude rate</td><td>ASPR (World)</td><td>ASPR (China)</td><td>N</td><td>Crude rate</td><td>ASPR (World)</td><td>ASPR (China)</td></tr><tr><td>Overall</td><td>89,045</td><td> </td><td>21,803</td><td>24.49%</td><td>26.08%</td><td>27.83%</td><td>12,963</td><td>14.56%</td><td>13.50%</td><td>12.01%</td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Sex</td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Women</td><td>57,384</td><td>64.44%</td><td>16,587</td><td>28.91%</td><td>31.39%</td><td>33.59%</td><td>6,330</td><td>11.03%</td><td>9.95%</td><td>8.53%</td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Men</td><td>31,661</td><td>35.56%</td><td>5,216</td><td>16.47%</td><td>17.68%</td><td>19.25%</td><td>6,633</td><td>20.95%</td><td>20.26%</td><td>18.31%</td></tr><tr><td>Education</td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Below bachelor’s degree</td><td>40,397</td><td>45.37%</td><td>11,150</td><td>27.60%</td><td>26.64%</td><td>28.40%</td><td>5,179</td><td>12.82%</td><td>13.89%</td><td>12.23%</td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Bachelor’s degree and above</td><td>48,556</td><td>54.53%</td><td>10,640</td><td>21.91%</td><td>25.88%</td><td>27.84%</td><td>7,770</td><td>16.00%</td><td>13.54%</td><td>12.19%</td></tr><tr><td>Missing</td><td>92</td><td>0.10%</td><td>13</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td>14</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Urban-rural location</td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Rural</td><td>23,272</td><td>26.14%</td><td>6,805</td><td>29.24%</td><td>29.45%</td><td>30.81%</td><td>2,510</td><td>10.79%</td><td>10.59%</td><td>9.42%</td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Urban</td><td>64,762</td><td>72.73%</td><td>14,756</td><td>22.78%</td><td>24.98%</td><td>26.85%</td><td>10,306</td><td>15.91%</td><td>14.50%</td><td>12.92%</td></tr><tr><td>Missing</td><td>1,011</td><td>1.14%</td><td>242</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td>147</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Employment status</td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Unemployed</td><td>28,331</td><td>31.82%</td><td>8,257</td><td>29.14%</td><td>29.76%</td><td>31.26%</td><td>3,170</td><td>11.19%</td><td>10.71%</td><td>9.54%</td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Employed</td><td>60,714</td><td>68.18%</td><td>13,546</td><td>22.31%</td><td>24.25%</td><td>26.38%</td><td>9,793</td><td>16.13%</td><td>15.68%</td><td>13.95%</td></tr><tr><td>Geographic region</td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>South</td><td>14,858</td><td>16.69%</td><td>2,308</td><td>15.53%</td><td>18.29%</td><td>20.53%</td><td>3,175</td><td>21.37%</td><td>19.90%</td><td>17.86%</td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>North</td><td>74,178</td><td>83.30%</td><td>19,492</td><td>26.28%</td><td>27.65%</td><td>29.29%</td><td>9,787</td><td>13.19%</td><td>12.23%</td><td>10.85%</td></tr><tr><td>Missing</td><td>9</td><td>0.01%</td><td>3</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td>1</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Regional HDI</td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Very high</td><td>10,839</td><td>12.17%</td><td>2,267</td><td>20.92%</td><td>20.94%</td><td>23.21%</td><td>1,872</td><td>17.27%</td><td>18.36%</td><td>15.89%</td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Middle-to-high</td><td>78,203</td><td>87.82%</td><td>19,535</td><td>24.98%</td><td>26.86%</td><td>28.63%</td><td>11,091</td><td>14.18%</td><td>13.03%</td><td>11.61%</td></tr><tr><td>Missing</td><td>3</td><td>0.00%</td><td>1</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td>0</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Age group (years)</td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>18-24</td><td>13,384</td><td>15.03%</td><td>2,727</td><td>20.38%</td><td> </td><td> </td><td>2,589</td><td>19.34%</td><td> </td><td> </td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>25-29</td><td>9,982</td><td>11.21%</td><td>1,413</td><td>14.16%</td><td> </td><td> </td><td>2,456</td><td>24.60%</td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>30-34</td><td>13,570</td><td>15.24%</td><td>2,731</td><td>20.13%</td><td> </td><td> </td><td>2,293</td><td>16.90%</td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>35-39</td><td>12,812</td><td>14.39%</td><td>2,922</td><td>22.81%</td><td> </td><td> </td><td>1,896</td><td>14.80%</td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>40-44</td><td>11,146</td><td>12.52%</td><td>2,946</td><td>26.43%</td><td> </td><td> </td><td>1,357</td><td>12.17%</td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>45-49</td><td>9,751</td><td>10.95%</td><td>2,915</td><td>29.89%</td><td> </td><td> </td><td>949</td><td>9.73%</td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>50-54</td><td>9,013</td><td>10.12%</td><td>2,975</td><td>33.01%</td><td> </td><td> </td><td>769</td><td>8.53%</td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>55-59</td><td>4,953</td><td>5.56%</td><td>1,570</td><td>31.70%</td><td> </td><td> </td><td>389</td><td>7.85%</td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>60-64</td><td>2,101</td><td>2.36%</td><td>719</td><td>34.22%</td><td> </td><td> </td><td>147</td><td>7.00%</td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>65-69</td><td>1,333</td><td>1.50%</td><td>512</td><td>38.41%</td><td> </td><td> </td><td>71</td><td>5.33%</td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>≥70</td><td>1,000</td><td>1.12%</td><td>373</td><td>37.30%</td><td> </td><td> </td><td>47</td><td>4.70%</td><td> </td><td> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The adoption rate of healthy lifestyles was lowest among participants aged 25–29 years (14.16%) and increased with age (P for trend &lt; 0.001), peaking at the 65–69-year age group (38.41%), except for a slight decline observed in those aged 55–59 years (31.70%) (Fig. 1). Conversely, the adoption rate of unhealthy lifestyles followed the opposite pattern, showing a decreasing trend with age (P for trend &lt; 0.001), with the highest level in the 25–29-year age group (24.60%) and declining to the lowest among those aged 70 years or older (4.70%). The similar lifestyle patterns were observed in subgroups stratified by sex, educational level, residential areas, and employment status (all P for trend &lt; 0.001, Fig. 2). However, men consistently had lower adoption rates of healthy lifestyles and higher adoption rates of unhealthy lifestyles across all age groups as compared to women.</p><fig id="fig-1"><caption><p>FIG. 1. Age-specific adoption rates of healthy and unhealthy lifestyle in 2018 WCRF/AICR groups.</p><p>Note: All P for trends were &lt;0.001. WCRF/AICR – World Cancer Research Fund/ American Institute for Cancer Research.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="brhejo-2-1-g001.jpeg"><uri content-type="original_file">https://cdn.elpub.ru/assets/journals/brhejo/2025/1/PdUpCx7vL37ZMe2AaMcvtWCVCdBfEV6h0Byowe8S.jpeg</uri></graphic></fig><fig id="fig-2"><caption><p>FIG. 2. Age-specific adoption rates of healthy and unhealthy lifestyle in 2018 WCRF/AICR groups, among subgroups.</p><p>Note: All P for trend were &lt;0.001 in all groups. WCRF/AICR – World Cancer Research Fund/ American Institute for Cancer Research, HDI – Human Development Index.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="brhejo-2-1-g002.jpeg"><uri content-type="original_file">https://cdn.elpub.ru/assets/journals/brhejo/2025/1/X7dPmMehves6jLryDLKx1vS7mKZ4tu430rB5DsrP.jpeg</uri></graphic></fig><fig id="fig-3"><caption><p>FIG. 2. (Continued). Age-specific adoption rates of healthy and unhealthy lifestyle in 2018 WCRF/AICR groups, among subgroups.</p><p>Note: All P for trend were &lt;0.001 in all groups. WCRF/AICR – World Cancer Research Fund/ American Institute for Cancer Research, HDI – Human Development Index.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="brhejo-2-1-g003.jpeg"><uri content-type="original_file">https://cdn.elpub.ru/assets/journals/brhejo/2025/1/9ciwVNYCZxbHG8dX7nHe0pCGVwc10HK5Omw7dI7w.jpeg</uri></graphic></fig><p>The age-specific adoption rates of healthy lifestyles were slightly higher among participants without a bachelor’s degree than those with a bachelor’s degree or above across the 25–29 to 65–69-year age groups. Compared with rural residents, urban participants had lower adoption rates of healthy lifestyles across all age groups except those aged 65 years or older, while the adoption rate of unhealthy lifestyles was higher among urban residents across all age groups. Among unemployed participants, the trend of healthy lifestyles almost mirrored that of the overall population, whereas among employed individuals, adoption rate increased from the 18-24-year (12.68%) to 50-54-year (32.01%) age groups before fluctuating in those aged 55 years or older, although the overall trend remained increasing. The adoption rate of unhealthy lifestyles was consistently higher among employed participants than unemployed individuals across all age groups.</p><p>Regional disparities were also observed. In northern China, the adoption rate of healthy lifestyles was higher, and that of unhealthy lifestyles was lower across all age groups except in the age group of 70 years or older. Stratification by regional HDI showed that participants living in very high HDI regions generally had lower adoption rates of healthy lifestyles, except in the 55–59-year age group. On the other hand, the adoption rate of unhealthy lifestyles was higher in very high HDI regions for all age groups before 60–64 years.</p><p>We further analyzed single lifestyle components, and found that adherence to recommendations regarding fruit, vegetable, and fiber intake was the lowest across all age groups (all age-specific prevalences &lt;40%; Fig. 3). Similarly, adherence to BMI recommendations and red meat intake guidelines was relatively low. In contrast, adherence to physical activity, sugar-sweetened drinks intake, and alcohol consumption guidelines was relatively higher. Older participants demonstrated greater adherence to recommendations for takeaway food consumption, sugar-sweetened drinks intake, red meat intake, and fruit, vegetable, and fiber intake. Among them, adherence to recommendations on takeaway food consumption showed substantial changes with age, with a marked increase starting from the 25–29 years (36.35%) to 70 years or older (95.40%) age group. Conversely, the age-specific adoption rate of unhealthy adherence followed the opposite trend.</p><fig id="fig-4"><caption><p>FIG. 3. Age-specific adoption rates of healthy (A) and unhealthy (B) lifestyle in 2018 WCRF/AICR components.</p><p>Note: For single lifestyles, healthy lifestyle represented “1 point” for the correspondent recommendation, and unhealthy lifestyle represented “0 points”. All P for trend were &lt;0.001 in all groups. WCRF/AICR – World Cancer Research Fund/ American Institute for Cancer Research, BMI – body mass index.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="brhejo-2-1-g004.jpeg"><uri content-type="original_file">https://cdn.elpub.ru/assets/journals/brhejo/2025/1/hi8aUIj3eEP7NFGIH6uvy1kEVBPtgCgOed3Zx6tF.jpeg</uri></graphic></fig></sec><sec><title>Discussion</title></sec><sec><title>Status of healthy lifestyles of contemporary Chinese population</title><p>To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first study to report the prevalence of combined lifestyles in adherence to the 2018 WCRF/AICR recommendations in a Chinese population. This study found that approximately a quarter of the people had healthy lifestyles. In general, women, older individuals, people lived in rural areas, and people lived in middle-to-high HDI regions were more likely to adopt healthy lifestyles. While compliance with the 2018 WCRF/AICR recommendations in this study was comparable to other studies, the fact that only about one fourth of the overall population and less than one fifth of young people adopted healthy lifestyles suggests that more efforts are needed to increasing adoption rates.</p><p>According to a national health literacy monitoring survey in 2021 in China, individuals with higher educational levels possessed greater health literacy than those with lower educational levels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit32">32</xref>]. However, our study did not observe a higher prevalence of healthy lifestyles among people with greater education levels. In developing counties like China, development of health-supportive system might lag behind rapid social and economic transformations, causing the health penalty to high social economic status individuals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit33">33</xref>]. On the other hand, unhealthy dietary and drinking options were less affordable and often perceived as privileges of the advantaged individuals. Other potential explanations may be due to lack of effective health education regarding primary cancer prevention. More efforts are needed to explore potential barriers to people adopting healthy lifestyles. Notably, the government launched the "Weight Management Year" initiative, aiming to promote healthy lifestyles, with a particular focus on a healthy lifestyle friendly environment6.</p><p>In China, 920 million people lived in urban areas and 733 million were employed7. These employed and lived in very high HDI regions and in urban areas often have greater financial power to afford unhealthy behaviors. Meanwhile, the fast-paced life, high work demand, extended working hours, job insecurity, and commuting difficulties made it difficult for people to adopt a healthy lifestyle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit34">34</xref>]. In our study men had significant lower rate of adopting healthy lifestyles compared to women, indicating that sex imbalance in social role might adversely affect men’s engagement in healthy lifestyles in China. Therefore, in addition to promoting health literacy, building a more supportive working and living environment is also essential in facilitating healthy lifestyle, such as creating healthy canteens, corporate gyms, and discouraging alcohol-based socializing.</p><p>All study participants were smartphone users who completed online surveys, the findings may not be generalizable to non-smartphone users in China, especially older adults. We reported age-standardized rates to address the concerns that majority of our study population were under 60 years old. In this study, takeaways, which included healthy and unhealthy options, were used to replace ultra-processed food, might introducing potential misclassification. Although the relationship between 2018 WCRF/AICR recommendations and cancer risk among Chinese population remains to be explored, targeted strategies should be implemented to increase the rate of healthy lifestyle in adherence to the 2018 WCRF/AICR recommendations to reduce the cancer burden in China, which accounted for about one fourth of the world’s newly diagnosed cancer cases in 2022 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit2">2</xref>].</p></sec><sec><title>Challenges in primary cancer prevention in China</title><p>The observed low prevalence of healthy lifestyles related to cancer prevention among the Chinese population suggests existing challenges in primary cancer prevention. Lack of health knowledge and awareness, as well as health misinformation and disinformation are the most significant barriers to making informed healthy lifestyle choices. Despite increasing access to information, health education and health literacy remain limited in many communities, making it difficult for these populations to make informed decisions about their health. On the other hand, rising social media usage, combined with anxiety and fear of cancer among the general population, has fueled the spread of a range of misleading claims about cancer prevention, which can probably lead people to disregard evidence-based preventive behaviors in favor of lifestyles endorsed by influencers, downplay the importance of mental health issues, and promote unregulated supplements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit35">35</xref>]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to establish an authoritative evidence-based information dissemination platform for cancer risk factors and preventive intervention measures to convey the facts in a way that leaves no room for misunderstanding and to enhance the correct understanding of healthy lifestyles for cancer prevention among the Chinese population. Since barriers to adopting a healthy lifestyle may vary depending on personal characteristics, sociocultural background, and environmental factors, the dissemination of healthy lifestyle information should also be tailored to each individual [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit36">36</xref>].</p><p>Lack of motivation is another major challenge to adopting and sticking to healthy lifestyles. Many people feel overwhelmed by the thought of starting healthy behaviors, especially those who have failed in past attempts to change and stick with such behaviors. This frustration can lead to procrastination and avoidance, making it more difficult to take the first step toward a healthier lifestyle. In addition, motivation may wane over time, particularly if the immediate effects on health are not evident. Therefore, when promoting healthy lifestyles to the general population, appropriate theoretical models should be applied to attract those unmotivated people who are difficult to reach with traditional health promotion activities, cultivate their motivation for action, and increase their acceptance and persistence of healthy behaviors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit37">37</xref>].</p><p>The Chinese population is diverse in terms of ethnicity, cultural background, geographic region, and socioeconomic status. These diversities are not only related to whether individuals actively choose a healthy lifestyle, but also to the objective accessibility of a healthy lifestyle. Mobile technology plays an increasingly important role in promoting healthy lifestyles as its low cost and multifunctionality make health resources more affordable and distributed more equitably. Mobile health (mHealth) provides easy access to information on diet and nutrition, guidance and assistance for training and exercise, and tracking and monitoring physical activity, food consumption, sleep, and phycological measurements (e.g., heart rate, blood pressure, and blood sugar), so wider use of mHealth should be encouraged to assist health promotion efforts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit36">36</xref>].</p></sec><sec><title>New initiatives in primary cancer prevention in China</title><p>In 2016, China released the “Healthy China 2030” national strategic plan, which identified national health as a development priority and reflected China’s commitment to participating in global Health governance and implementing the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development8 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit38">38</xref>]. Under the framework of the “Healthy China Action Plan 2019-2030”, the State Council of China issued two versions of the Healthy China Action – Cancer Prevention and Control Implementation Plan in 2019 and 2023, respectively. These national strategies emphasized reducing exposure to cancer risk factors to prevent cancer. In line with the national policies and promoting healthy lifestyles for primary cancer prevention, the National Cancer Center of China (NCC China) developed China Code Against Cancer (CCAC) and the SmartHMDP-PCP.</p></sec><sec><title>China Code Against Cancer</title><p>To inform the general public about evidence-based behaviors that can be taken to reduce cancer risk, NCC China published the CCAC 2025 version and established the CCAC official website (https://ccacdcpc.org.cn/) as an authoritative communication platform for cancer-related health information. The CCAC was drafted under the general framework of the World Code Against Cancer Framework proposed by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, which was aimed to encourage countries and regions to develop regional codes against cancer according to their local characteristics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit39">39</xref>].</p><p>The CCAC 2025 version includes 15 action-based recommendations to guide the public to adopt healthy lifestyles, avoid or reduce exposure to carcinogenic agents, and participate in vaccinations, aiming to reduce an individual’s risk of developing or dying from cancer. The CCAC is presented in Supplement B (supplementary materials on the journal website https://doi.org/10.47093/3034-4700.2025.2.1.38-52-annex-b). All the recommendations were developed in accordance with the following principles: 1) based on strong scientific evidence, balancing risks and benefits, and posing no additional risks to individuals when implemented; 2) broadly applicable to the general Chinese population without requiring any prerequisites or expertise; 3) taking into account the spectrum of cancer burden in China, the cultural practices of different populations, and the distribution of healthcare services; and 4) able to be clearly and concisely communicated in simple, instructive language that is easy for the public to understand and follow.</p></sec><sec><title>Smart Health Management Digital Platform for Primary Cancer Prevention</title><p>The NCC China has also developed a smartphone health applet, the SmartHMDP-PCP, to address the challenge of lacking an effective mechanism to attract people to actively adopt and adhere to a healthy lifestyle. The SmartHMDP-PCP can serve as an innovative solution to provide a cost-effective approach for personalized cancer prevention interventions and offer sustainable incentives for the public to engage in healthy lifestyles.</p><p>The SmartHMDP-PCP is powered by mobile technology, data science, and personalized intervention strategies. It runs in the WeChat environment. People can use the applet to 1) assess their risk of developing 19 types of cancer, including the cancers of the brain, head and neck, thyroid, lung, esophagus, stomach, liver, pancreas, colorectum, kidney, bladder, female breast, ovaries, endometrium, cervix, and prostate, as well as leukemia, Hodgkin lymphoma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma; 2) track and archive their long-term exposure to behavioral, environmental, social, psychological, medical, and metabolic factors; and 3) obtain personalized intervention strategies for healthy lifestyles to reduce their cancer risk.</p><p>The SmartHMDP-PCP has multiple advantages in healthy lifestyle assistance and primary cancer prevention. This applet is based on smart mobile devices and commonly used social software, so it can be easily accessed and used in daily life. Given the continued development of mobile technology and the increasing number of mobile technology users, the impact of such mHealth interventions is likely to expand further. In addition, the highly cost-effective nature of mHealth interventions enables them to be widely disseminated to different socioeconomic groups without geographical restrictions, which can to some extent reduce potential inequalities in the distribution and access to health resources among large and diverse populations. Real-time assessment and early warning of future cancer risks, as well as interactive systems for reporting cancer-related exposures and targeted preventive interventions, can potentially improve user engagement and compliance. The personalized health education and cancer prevention interventions provided by SmartHMDP-PCP achieved two-stage behavior changes by promoting health cognition and reducing action barriers, respectively. There is evidence that health interventions based on both cognitive and proactive phases of behavior change are more effective than interventions based on either phase alone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit40">40</xref>]. In addition, personalized health information and intervention strategies are more likely to increase individual engagement and trigger central persuasion pathways, leading to a stable motivational effect during application [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit40">40</xref>]. The SmartHMDP-PCP also used the health belief model and protection motivation theory to further enhance the effect of behavior change. The cancer risk early warning system can serve as a threat trigger to motivate individuals to take actions to promote health and prevent cancer. The engagement and retention of SmartHMDP-PCP users are also key factors in achieving a long-term and sustainable healthy lifestyle, as significant health effects require a certain level intensity and persistence of intervention.</p><p>In conclusion, there are variations of healthy lifestyles adoption rates among the contemporary Chinese population. CCAC provides an authoritative platform for disseminating evidence-based information, and SmartHMDP-PCP provides novel approaches for individualized primary cancer prevention, putting national policies into practice. Further implementation and continuous evaluation and updating are necessary to achieve optimistic adoption rates of healthy lifestyles.</p><p>1. World Health Organization. Non communicable diseases. Accessed March 14, 2025. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases2. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Global Cancer Observatory. Accessed 16.02.2025. https://gco.iarc.fr/ Office of the Leading Group of the State3. Office of the Leading Group of the State Council for the Seventh National Population Census. China Population Census Yearbook 2020. Beijing: China Statistic Press. 20224. Ahmad OB, Boschi-Pinto C, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, Lozano R, Inoue M. Age standardization of rates: a new WHO standard. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. Accessed 16.02.2025. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/gho-documents/global-health-estimates/gpe_discussion_paper_series_paper31_ 2001_age_standardization_rates.pdf5. United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Index (HDI). United Nations Development Programme. Accessed 16.02.2025. https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/human-development-index#/indicies/HDI6. The National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Notice on the Implementation Plan for the "Weight Management Year" Activity. (in Chinese). Accessed 16.02.2025. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/ylyjs/pqt/202406/b4f7141179504bd69d7a18db6d877f47.shtml7. Chinese National Bureau of Statistics. China Statistical Yearbook 2023. Beijing: China Statistics Press; 2023. Accessed 16.02.2025. https://www.stats.gov. cn/sj/ndsj/2023/indexeh.htm8. United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Accessed 17.02.2025. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">GBD 2013 DALYs and HALE Collaborators, Murray CJL, Barber RM, et al. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990-2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition. Lancet. 2015;386(10009):2145-2191. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">GBD 2013 DALYs and HALE Collaborators, Murray CJL, Barber RM, et al. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990-2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition. Lancet. 2015;386(10009):2145-2191. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2024;74(3):229-263. doi:10.3322/caac.21834</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2024;74(3):229-263. doi:10.3322/caac.21834</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brennan P, Davey-Smith G. Identifying Novel Causes of Cancers to Enhance Cancer Prevention: New Strategies Are Needed. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;114(3):353-360. doi:10.1093/jnci/djab204</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brennan P, Davey-Smith G. Identifying Novel Causes of Cancers to Enhance Cancer Prevention: New Strategies Are Needed. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;114(3):353-360. doi:10.1093/jnci/djab204</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">World Health Organization. Cancer Control: Knowledge into Action: WHO Guide for Effective Programmes: Module 2: Prevention [M]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007. 56 p; ISBN 92 4 154711 1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">World Health Organization. Cancer Control: Knowledge into Action: WHO Guide for Effective Programmes: Module 2: Prevention [M]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007. 56 p; ISBN 92 4 154711 1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bray F, Jemal A, Torre LA, Forman D, Vineis P. Long-term Realism and Cost-effectiveness: Primary Prevention in Combatting Cancer and Associated Inequalities Worldwide. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(12):djv273. doi:10.1093/jnci/djv273</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bray F, Jemal A, Torre LA, Forman D, Vineis P. Long-term Realism and Cost-effectiveness: Primary Prevention in Combatting Cancer and Associated Inequalities Worldwide. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(12):djv273. doi:10.1093/jnci/djv273</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Khushalani JS, Song S, Calhoun BH, Puddy RW, Kucik JE. Preventing Leading Causes of Death: Systematic Review of Cost-Utility Literature. Am J Prev Med. 2022;62(2):275-284. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2021.07.019</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khushalani JS, Song S, Calhoun BH, Puddy RW, Kucik JE. Preventing Leading Causes of Death: Systematic Review of Cost-Utility Literature. Am J Prev Med. 2022;62(2):275-284. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2021.07.019</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">GBD 2019 Cancer Risk Factors Collaborators. The global burden of cancer attributable to risk factors, 2010-19: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2022;400(10352):563-591. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01438-6</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">GBD 2019 Cancer Risk Factors Collaborators. The global burden of cancer attributable to risk factors, 2010-19: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2022;400(10352):563-591. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01438-6</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhou M, Wang H, Zeng X, et al. Mortality, morbidity, and risk factors in China and its provinces, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2019;394(10204):1145-1158. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30427-1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhou M, Wang H, Zeng X, et al. Mortality, morbidity, and risk factors in China and its provinces, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2019;394(10204):1145-1158. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30427-1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McAloney K, Graham H, Law C, Platt L. A scoping review of statistical approaches to the analysis of multiple health-related behaviours. Preventive Medicine. 2013;56(6):365-371. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.03.002</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McAloney K, Graham H, Law C, Platt L. A scoping review of statistical approaches to the analysis of multiple health-related behaviours. Preventive Medicine. 2013;56(6):365-371. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.03.002</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shams-White MM, Brockton NT, Mitrou P, et al. Operationalizing the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) Cancer Prevention Recommendations: A Standardized Scoring System. Nutrients. 2019;11(7):1572. doi:10.3390/nu11071572</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shams-White MM, Brockton NT, Mitrou P, et al. Operationalizing the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) Cancer Prevention Recommendations: A Standardized Scoring System. Nutrients. 2019;11(7):1572. doi:10.3390/nu11071572</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shams-White MM, Brockton NT, Mitrou P, Kahle LL, Reedy J. The 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) Score and All-Cause, Cancer, and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality Risk: A Longitudinal Analysis in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Curr Dev Nutr. 2022;6(6):nzac096. doi:10.1093/cdn/nzac096</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shams-White MM, Brockton NT, Mitrou P, Kahle LL, Reedy J. The 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) Score and All-Cause, Cancer, and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality Risk: A Longitudinal Analysis in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Curr Dev Nutr. 2022;6(6):nzac096. doi:10.1093/cdn/nzac096</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Malcomson FC, Wiggins C, Parra-Soto S, et al. Adherence to the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Recommendations and cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer. 2023;129(17):2655-2670. doi:10.1002/cncr.34842</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Malcomson FC, Wiggins C, Parra-Soto S, et al. Adherence to the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Recommendations and cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer. 2023;129(17):2655-2670. doi:10.1002/cncr.34842</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Onyeaghala G, Lintelmann AK, Joshu CE, et al. Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research cancer prevention guidelines and colorectal cancer incidence among African Americans and whites: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. Cancer. 2020;126(5):1041-1050. doi:10.1002/cncr.32616</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Onyeaghala G, Lintelmann AK, Joshu CE, et al. Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research cancer prevention guidelines and colorectal cancer incidence among African Americans and whites: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. Cancer. 2020;126(5):1041-1050. doi:10.1002/cncr.32616</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhang ZQ, Li QJ, Hao FB, et al. Adherence to the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research cancer prevention recommendations and pancreatic cancer incidence and mortality: A prospective cohort study. Cancer Med. 2020;9(18):6843-6853. doi:10.1002/cam4.3348</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhang ZQ, Li QJ, Hao FB, et al. Adherence to the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research cancer prevention recommendations and pancreatic cancer incidence and mortality: A prospective cohort study. Cancer Med. 2020;9(18):6843-6853. doi:10.1002/cam4.3348</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kaluza J, Harris HR, Håkansson N, Wolk A. Adherence to the WCRF/AICR 2018 recommendations for cancer prevention and risk of cancer: prospective cohort studies of men and women. Br J Cancer. 2020;122(10):1562-1570. doi:10.1038/s41416-020-0806-x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kaluza J, Harris HR, Håkansson N, Wolk A. Adherence to the WCRF/AICR 2018 recommendations for cancer prevention and risk of cancer: prospective cohort studies of men and women. Br J Cancer. 2020;122(10):1562-1570. doi:10.1038/s41416-020-0806-x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Barrubés L, Babio N, Hernández-Alonso P, et al. Association between the 2018 WCRF/AICR and the Low-Risk Lifestyle Scores with Colorectal Cancer Risk in the Predimed Study. J Clin Med. 2020;9(4):1215. doi:10.3390/jcm9041215</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Barrubés L, Babio N, Hernández-Alonso P, et al. Association between the 2018 WCRF/AICR and the Low-Risk Lifestyle Scores with Colorectal Cancer Risk in the Predimed Study. J Clin Med. 2020;9(4):1215. doi:10.3390/jcm9041215</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Arthur RS, Wang T, Xue X, Kamensky V, Rohan TE. Genetic Factors, Adherence to Healthy Lifestyle Behavior, and Risk of Invasive Breast Cancer Among Women in the UK Biobank. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020;112(9):893-901. doi:10.1093/jnci/djz241</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Arthur RS, Wang T, Xue X, Kamensky V, Rohan TE. Genetic Factors, Adherence to Healthy Lifestyle Behavior, and Risk of Invasive Breast Cancer Among Women in the UK Biobank. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020;112(9):893-901. doi:10.1093/jnci/djz241</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Barrios-Rodríguez R, Toledo E, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, et al. Adherence to the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Recommendations and Breast Cancer in the SUN Project. Nutrients. 2020;12(7):2076. doi:10.3390/nu12072076</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Barrios-Rodríguez R, Toledo E, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, et al. Adherence to the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Recommendations and Breast Cancer in the SUN Project. Nutrients. 2020;12(7):2076. doi:10.3390/nu12072076</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hermans KEPE, van den Brandt PA, Loef C, Jansen RLH, Schouten LJ. Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund and the American Institute for Cancer Research lifestyle recommendations for cancer prevention and Cancer of Unknown Primary risk. Clin Nutr. 2022;41(2):526-535. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2021.12.038</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hermans KEPE, van den Brandt PA, Loef C, Jansen RLH, Schouten LJ. Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund and the American Institute for Cancer Research lifestyle recommendations for cancer prevention and Cancer of Unknown Primary risk. Clin Nutr. 2022;41(2):526-535. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2021.12.038</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Karavasiloglou N, Pestoni G, Kühn T, Rohrmann S. Adherence to cancer prevention recommendations and risk of breast cancer in situ in the United Kingdom Biobank. Int J Cancer. 2022;151(10):1674-1683. doi:10.1002/ijc.34183</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Karavasiloglou N, Pestoni G, Kühn T, Rohrmann S. Adherence to cancer prevention recommendations and risk of breast cancer in situ in the United Kingdom Biobank. Int J Cancer. 2022;151(10):1674-1683. doi:10.1002/ijc.34183</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Malcomson FC, Parra-Soto S, Lu L, et al. Socio-demographic variation in adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF)/American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) Cancer Prevention Recommendations within the UK Biobank prospective cohort study. J Public Health (Oxf). Published online November 20, 2023:fdad218. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdad218</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Malcomson FC, Parra-Soto S, Lu L, et al. Socio-demographic variation in adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF)/American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) Cancer Prevention Recommendations within the UK Biobank prospective cohort study. J Public Health (Oxf). Published online November 20, 2023:fdad218. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdad218</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Karavasiloglou N, Pestoni G, Pannen ST, et al. How prevalent is a cancer-protective lifestyle? Adherence to the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research cancer prevention recommendations in Switzerland. Br J Nutr. 2023;130(5):904-910. doi:10.1017/S0007114522003968</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Karavasiloglou N, Pestoni G, Pannen ST, et al. How prevalent is a cancer-protective lifestyle? Adherence to the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research cancer prevention recommendations in Switzerland. Br J Nutr. 2023;130(5):904-910. doi:10.1017/S0007114522003968</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Olmedo-Requena R, Lozano-Lorca M, Salcedo-Bellido I, et al. Compliance with the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Recommendations and Prostate Cancer. Nutrients. 2020;12(3):768. doi:10.3390/nu12030768</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Olmedo-Requena R, Lozano-Lorca M, Salcedo-Bellido I, et al. Compliance with the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Recommendations and Prostate Cancer. Nutrients. 2020;12(3):768. doi:10.3390/nu12030768</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Solans M, Romaguera D, Gracia-Lavedan E, et al. Adherence to the 2018 WCRF/AICR cancer prevention guidelines and chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the MCC-Spain study. Cancer Epidemiol. 2020;64:101629. doi:10.1016/j.canep.2019.101629</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Solans M, Romaguera D, Gracia-Lavedan E, et al. Adherence to the 2018 WCRF/AICR cancer prevention guidelines and chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the MCC-Spain study. Cancer Epidemiol. 2020;64:101629. doi:10.1016/j.canep.2019.101629</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hawrysz I, Wadolowska L, Slowinska MA, Czerwinska A, Golota JJ. Lung Cancer Risk in Men and Compliance with the 2018 WCRF/AICR Cancer Prevention Recommendations. Nutrients. 2022;14(20):4295. doi:10.3390/nu14204295</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hawrysz I, Wadolowska L, Slowinska MA, Czerwinska A, Golota JJ. Lung Cancer Risk in Men and Compliance with the 2018 WCRF/AICR Cancer Prevention Recommendations. Nutrients. 2022;14(20):4295. doi:10.3390/nu14204295</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Peng Y, Bassett JK, Hodge AM, et al. Adherence to 2018 WCRF/AICR cancer prevention recommendations and risk of cancer: the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. Published online November 9, 2023. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0945</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Peng Y, Bassett JK, Hodge AM, et al. Adherence to 2018 WCRF/AICR cancer prevention recommendations and risk of cancer: the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. Published online November 9, 2023. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0945</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jacobs I, Taljaard-Krugell C, Wicks M, et al. Adherence to cancer prevention recommendations is associated with a lower breast cancer risk in black urban South African women. Br J Nutr. 2022;127(6):927-938. doi:10.1017/S0007114521001598</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jacobs I, Taljaard-Krugell C, Wicks M, et al. Adherence to cancer prevention recommendations is associated with a lower breast cancer risk in black urban South African women. Br J Nutr. 2022;127(6):927-938. doi:10.1017/S0007114521001598</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Huang H, Sun P, Zou K, He J, Zhang Y. Current situation and prospect of primary prevention of cancer in China. Chin J Oncol. 2022;44(9):942-949. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20220209-00083</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Huang H, Sun P, Zou K, He J, Zhang Y. Current situation and prospect of primary prevention of cancer in China. Chin J Oncol. 2022;44(9):942-949. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20220209-00083</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Institute of Nutrition and Food Safety, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. China Food Composition 2002. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press; 2002</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Institute of Nutrition and Food Safety, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. China Food Composition 2002. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press; 2002</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Institute of Nutrition and Food Safety, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. China Food Composition 2004. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press; 2004</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Institute of Nutrition and Food Safety, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. China Food Composition 2004. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press; 2004</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Collaborative Group for Data Compilation and Analysis on Obesity Issues in China. Predictive values of body mass index and waist circumference to risk factors of related diseases in Chinese adult population. Chinese Journal of Epidemiology. 2002;23(1):5-10. (in Chinese).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Collaborative Group for Data Compilation and Analysis on Obesity Issues in China. Predictive values of body mass index and waist circumference to risk factors of related diseases in Chinese adult population. Chinese Journal of Epidemiology. 2002;23(1):5-10. (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhang G, Li Y, Li L, et al. A study on health literacy level and its influencing factors among urban and rural residents in China, 2021. Chin. J. Health Educ. 2024;40(5):387-400. (in Chinese).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhang G, Li Y, Li L, et al. A study on health literacy level and its influencing factors among urban and rural residents in China, 2021. Chin. J. Health Educ. 2024;40(5):387-400. (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Miao J, Wu X. Urbanization, socioeconomic status and health disparity in China. Health &amp; Place. 2016;42:87–95. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.09.008</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Miao J, Wu X. Urbanization, socioeconomic status and health disparity in China. Health &amp; Place. 2016;42:87–95. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.09.008</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rubin M. Job-Related Determinants of Unhealthy Lifestyles. J Occup Environ Med. 2018;60(12):e647-e655. doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000001456</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rubin M. Job-Related Determinants of Unhealthy Lifestyles. J Occup Environ Med. 2018;60(12):e647-e655. doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000001456</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The Lancet. Health in the age of disinformation. The Lancet. 2025;405(10474):173. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00094-7</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The Lancet. Health in the age of disinformation. The Lancet. 2025;405(10474):173. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00094-7</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Subramaniam M, Devi F, AshaRani PV, et al. Barriers and facilitators for adopting a healthy lifestyle in a multi-ethnic population: A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2022;17(11):e0277106. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0277106</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Subramaniam M, Devi F, AshaRani PV, et al. Barriers and facilitators for adopting a healthy lifestyle in a multi-ethnic population: A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2022;17(11):e0277106. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0277106</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hardcastle SJ, Hancox J, Hattar A, et al. Motivating the unmotivated: how can health behavior be changed in those unwilling to change? Front Psychol. 2015;6:835. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00835</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hardcastle SJ, Hancox J, Hattar A, et al. Motivating the unmotivated: how can health behavior be changed in those unwilling to change? Front Psychol. 2015;6:835. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00835</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit38"><label>38</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chen P, Li F, Harmer P. Healthy China 2030: moving from blueprint to action with a new focus on public health. The Lancet Public Health. 2019;4(9):e447. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30160-4</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chen P, Li F, Harmer P. Healthy China 2030: moving from blueprint to action with a new focus on public health. The Lancet Public Health. 2019;4(9):e447. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30160-4</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit39"><label>39</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Espina C, Herrero R, Sankaranarayanan R, et al. Toward the World Code Against Cancer. J Glob Oncol. 2018;4:1-8. doi:10.1200/JGO.17.00145</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Espina C, Herrero R, Sankaranarayanan R, et al. Toward the World Code Against Cancer. J Glob Oncol. 2018;4:1-8. doi:10.1200/JGO.17.00145</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit40"><label>40</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yang Q, Van Stee SK. The Comparative Effectiveness of Mobile Phone Interventions in Improving Health Outcomes: Meta-Analytic Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(4):e11244. doi:10.2196/11244</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yang Q, Van Stee SK. The Comparative Effectiveness of Mobile Phone Interventions in Improving Health Outcomes: Meta-Analytic Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(4):e11244. doi:10.2196/11244</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
